Published on Wednesday, February 3, 2016
AUTOPROBE VS. HAND SAMPLING
In the fall of 2015, PFR Agronomist, Scott Nelson conducted a soil sampling comparison in Iowa and Missouri, between the AutoProbe™ automated soil sampling technology and traditional hand sampling. The standard method of assessing these nutrients is by soil sampling at 2.5 grids. In this research, we examined the profitability of various soil sampling schemes including use of an automated soil sampling machine developed by AutoProbe.
Two fields were sampled according to the following soil sampling schemes.
Hand sampled at 1.25 acre grids
Hand sampled at 2.5 acre grids
AutoProbe sampled at 1.25 acre grids
AutoProbe sampled at 2.5 acre grids
One field was located near Mt. Vernon, Iowa on a farm with known yield variability. The second field was located in Marshall, Missouri. The Marshall field had a history of intense sampling and high management.
Adequate potassium, phosphorous, and pH are key foundations for optimum yield and profitability. Soil tests for organic matter, CEC, potassium, pH and phosphorous were conducted by A&L labs. Soil test points were spatially analyzed to create fertilizer prescriptions based upon the various sampling practices. Spatial analysis involved ordinary kriging to best simulate fertilizer spread maps developed by the fertilizer industry.
AUTOPROBE — AUTOMATED SOIL SAMPLING TECHNOLOGY
Traditional hand sampling simply cannot reap the quality sample that today’s farmers require to get the results promised by precision agriculture technologies.
Soil sampling methods haven’t changed much since collecting soil samples began. Typically four to six cores are pulled by hand at inconsistent depths and angles from the center of a grid, covering only 30 feet. Mechanical soil sampling methods pull cores more consistently but still typically only deliver six to twelve cores pulled from a small area.
According to AgRobotics, AutoProbe™ automated soil sampling technology effortlessly collects up to 40 cores per sample from the comfort of a tractor cab. The distance, angle, and depth are consistent, uniform, and accurate. Precise sampling leads to precise planting and precise nutrient
management, which allows maximum yield, lower costs, and greater profit.
SOIL SAMPLING FOR POTASSIUM & PHOSPHOROUS
AutoProbe spread maps for potassium and phosphorous were significantly more detailed compared to hand sampling for both fields (Figures 1-3).
FIGURE 1. Amount of potassium fertilizer to spread to bring soil tests into the optimum range. (Mt. Vernon, Iowa field)
FIGURE 2. Amount of phosphorous fertilizer to spread to bring soil tests into the optimum range. (Mt. Vernon, Iowa field)
FIGURE 3. Amount of potassium fertilizer to spread to bring soil tests into the optimum range. (Marshall, Missouri field)
SOIL SAMPLING FOR ORGANIC MATTER
Interestingly, organic matter maps were also dramatically different between AutoProbe sampling and hand sampling at the Mt. Vernon field (Figure 5). AutoProbe detected areas of high and low organic matter where hand sampling did not. The dramatically different phosphorous, potassium, organic matter, and pH maps provide significant evidence that hand sampling and AutoProbe sampling are not similar. The AutoProbe machine samples every 90 ft. and bulks the samples according to whatever grid size the farmer wants
to test. This greater sampling across the landscape tends to smooth out extreme values from limited hand sample probes, while providing greater detail on the soil test across the landscape.
"AutoProbe mechanized soil sampler takes the guess work out of pulling quality soil samples. And, it speeds up the process to allow for more cores to be pulled from a wider area at the same angle and to the same depth. These may sound like little things, but they’re huge when it comes to making predictions for a nutrient application in the correct amounts on the right hybrids to maximize yields. The work we’ve been conducting on variable rate and variable hybrid planting will become common place in the near future in more farmers fields. I predict the same thing is true for mechanized soil samples using the AutoProbe. This may become the new standard by which precision farming soil samples are measured. This could help us do a better job by analyzing quality soil sample analysis data upfront. We’ll be able to apply the most optimal amounts of nutrients to produce the highest yields.”
- Jason Webster, PFR Innovation Lead
SOIL SAMPLING RESULTS
Table 1 shows tabulated results for potassium prescriptions based upon the various sampling practices for the two fields. In the Iowa field, hand sampling at 1.25 acre grids resulted in fertilizer savings of 1,987 lb. or $451.05 cost savings for the field based upon a potassium cost of $454/ton. For the same field, AutoProbe sampling at 2.5 acre grids resulted in fertilizer savings of 3,796 lb. or $861.70 for the entire 72 acre field. While spread maps were significantly different between AutoProbe sampling at 1.25 acre grids and 2.5 acre grids, the amount of predicted fertilizer savings was remarkably similar.
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
In an Iowa field, sampling at 1.25 acre grids resulted in potash savings of $451.00 on a 72 acre field or $6.00/A.
In the same field, AutoProbe sampling at 2.5 acre grids compared to hand sampling at 2.5 acre grids predicted less potash needed resulting in savings of $861.70 or $12.00/A.
Results from a field in Missouri where potassium levels were high was less conclusive.
Management zone maps generated from AutoProbe were more detailed and significantly different compared to hand sampling.
These results provide evidence that denser soil sampling using automated soil sampling machines could increase profitability.
Sampling additional fields will be necessary to derive firm conclusions on the merits of denser soil sampling.
January 2016 PFR Report. AutoProbe™ Technologies Automated Soil Sampling is a trademark of AgRobotics. Individual results may vary.
Author: Ryan McAllister
Categories: PFR, PFR Reports
Tags: Practical Farm Research, Soil Sampling, PFR, PFR Report, Scott Nelson, Iowa PFR, AutoProbe, Fertility Managment
Practical Farm Research Director at Beck's.